Stomach Pains Peeing Alot

response to someone (police) on 03/02/2010

by: Eric
Guist
On Bachl
13 85049 Ingolstadt
eMail: erich1@guist.de
privately: http://guist. de /
internet: http://aktepaypal2070.orangejournal2553.de/

to:
Grill Ernst Meier, POK
Kriminalpolizeiinspektion
Ingolstadt Esplanade 40 85049 Ingolstadt

E-mail: @ ernst.grillmeier


Ingolstadt 04.02.2010

polizei.bayern.de reply to the email on 03/02/2010
Subject 'subpoena for witnesses to Az: 1380-011028-09 / 3'


Mr Grill Meier,

thank you for your e-mail message dated 03.02.2010. As you already from my parents by phone two contacts know, I have no telephone connection.
This is due to my current situation from my past self-employment as an undertaker in Ingolstadt by private Insolvency and currently Hartz4 receiver was summoned. So my contact information limited to the Internet is still free. I ask for your understanding, Thank you.

happy I send you all necessary information as an attachment via e-mail and answer the questions.

open questions: first
Why is the display to North Rhine-Westphalia and was sent to Ingolstadt KPI?
Because the Internet only in North Rhine-Westphalia, there is a complaint portal.

second When they ordered the goods or services?
excerpt from Annex 2: At 12:09:09 I have the firm 'GDP DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT SERVICE CO., LTD..' or 'HICHINA ZHICHENG TECHNOLOGY LTD. " a job with the account number: GDP10909120326204 granted.

third Which product or service was this?
A 'in-game-service' performance means so much in the game settings. These services are offered by many different suppliers around the world for different products and games. The demand is so high that the services are not only in price but mainly compete against each other in the execution time.

4th When documents are available who can verify the facts?
Yes, part is on the Internet at the above address publicly available.
are given in this letter and the attachments as shown in Appendix 5 are about 38 more e-mails and other documents.

5th What you take offense ad?
Well, how shall I express it as ordinary citizens without legal knowledge. The company has about PayPal
11.10.2009 paid from my PayPal account associated with an amount of € 20.70, although I on 21/09/2009 a written confirmation, see Appendix 3, my complaint to PayPal to make this payment NOT have received.
That means to me that PayPal has paid the company anything, although I have said before
proven to pay the PayPal does NOT! The
still not known to me automatically-state-legal-opportunity I got from a lawyer Andreas Schneider (last letter, see Appendix 4) a demand for payment of € 66.00 received by 31.12.2009. This shows me that the firm PayPal ignored my complaint and an attorney with questionable methodology in law asks me to pay something I did not get it. The
the crime is that I bring for display.

6th If there are other educational needs, so please call.
I can not live, should not the e-mail contact must be sufficient, I would like to come over personally to get to know you and the witnesses or whatever is needed to accomplish.

I am grateful for the opportunity to let you send documents by email and may want a beautiful and joyous day.

Yours sincerely,

Erich Guist


plants:
1.PolizeiBayernEMail030210-01.png
2.StrafanzeigePayPal251209-01.pdf
3.PP-BeschwerdeErhalten210909.png
4.AWAndreasSchneider221209.pdf
5.eMail-Overview-00.png
6.This letter (PolizeiBayernEMail040210-01.pdf)